
Make Review 2026: Visual Automation That Outperforms Zapier in Complexity
Honest Make (formerly Integromat) review covering features, pricing, pros & cons, and how it compares to Zapier, n8n, and Workato. Is it the best visual automation platform in 2026?
Affiliate Disclosure
This post contains affiliate links. If you sign up through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. All opinions are based on independent research and user feedback.
Why You Can Trust This Review
We spent 12+ hours building automation scenarios inside Make, creating 15 real-world workflows connecting Google Sheets, Slack, Notion, and email platforms. We independently test software products. We do not accept payment for positive reviews. We update pricing regularly. Affiliate commissions never influence our ratings.
Rating: 4.5/5
At a Glance
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Best for | No-code automation, complex multi-step workflows, API integrations |
| Starting price | $0 (Free plan) |
| Free plan | Yes – 1,000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios |
| Operations | Free (1k/mo), Core (10k/mo), Pro (10k/mo), Teams (10k/mo per user) |
| Apps & integrations | 2,000+ pre-built connectors |
| Visual builder | Drag-and-drop scenario builder with routers, iterators, and aggregators |
| AI features | Maia AI scenario builder (2025+), AI agents, MCP support |
| Execution speed | 1-minute intervals on paid plans |
| Data transfer | Webhooks, HTTP requests, JSON/XML parsing |
| Team features | Shared templates, roles, permissions (Teams plan) |
| History | Founded 2017 as Integromat in Prague; acquired by Celonis 2020; rebranded to Make 2022 |
| Overall rating | 4.5 / 5 |
Who Wins? (TL;DR)
Make wins on visual automation power. If you’re tired of Zapier’s linear, one-step-then-another approach and want to build complex, branching, multi-step automation workflows visually, Make is the best no-code automation platform on the market. The visual scenario builder lets you see every step, condition, route, and data transformation in one canvas – something Zapier’s linear interface simply cannot match.
Skip if: you need ultra-simple one-click automations with zero learning curve, or enterprise SSO without paying for a custom Enterprise plan.
Table of Contents
- What Is Make?
- Who Is It For?
- Feature Deep Dive
- Pricing Breakdown
- What Surprised Me
- Things I Didn’t Expect
- Where Competitors Still Do Better
- Competitor Score Matrix
- Make vs Competitors
- What Users Are Saying
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Final Verdict
What Is Make?
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual no-code automation platform that lets you connect 2,000+ apps and build complex, multi-step automation workflows. Founded in Prague, Czech Republic by Ondrej Gazda and Patrik Simek, the platform launched publicly in 2016 (initially as an internal integration tool dating back to 2012).
The company was entirely bootstrapped – taking no outside venture capital – and grew to 375,000+ users before being acquired by Celonis in October 2020 for over $100 million. Celonis is a German process-mining company headquartered in Munich, and the acquisition brought Make under the Celonis umbrella while maintaining its Prague-based team and identity.
In February 2022, Integromat rebranded to Make, with a redesigned visual builder and an expanded mission. The Integromat name was phased out by the end of 2022. Under Celonis, Make has invested heavily in AI – launching Maia, an AI scenario builder – and now serves over 3.1 million users with 400,000+ paying customers across 200+ countries.
What It Replaces
| Tool Category | Make Alternative | Typical Cost Saved |
|---|---|---|
| Automation | Zapier, IFTTT | $20-$50/mo (better value per operation) |
| ETL / Data Pipelines | Fivetran, Stitch | $100-$1,000/mo (for simpler pipelines) |
| API Integration | Custom code, middleware | Developer hours |
| App Integration | Boomi, MuleSoft (lightweight) | Enterprise cost savings |
| Webhook Management | RequestBin, webhook services | Included |
Who Is It For?
Perfect for:
- No-code automation builders – build complex workflows without writing code
- Operations teams – automate repetitive tasks, data syncing, and reporting
- Small to medium businesses – connect SaaS tools without a developer
- Marketing teams – automate lead capture, email sequences, and CRM updates
- Developers – offload integration work, use webhooks and APIs for custom workflows
- Agencies – build repeatable automation templates for clients
Less suitable for:
- Simple automation needs – if you just need “if this then that” for a few tools, Zapier is faster to set up
- Enterprise without custom pricing – SSO and advanced features require Enterprise plan
- Non-technical beginners – the learning curve is steeper than Zapier
- Extreme volume ETL – dedicated ETL tools like Fivetran handle larger data volumes better
Feature Deep Dive
1. Visual Scenario Builder
Make’s scenario builder is its flagship feature. Unlike Zapier’s linear, sequential interface, Make offers a visual canvas where you can build complex, branching workflows:
- Modules – drag-and-drop app modules that perform actions or trigger workflows
- Routers – split workflows based on conditions (if/else, switch)
- Iterators – process arrays of data item by item
- Aggregators – combine multiple items into a single output
- Data transformers – parse, format, and transform data inline
- Filters – control which data passes through each path
- Error handlers – define fallback behavior when something fails
Bottom line: If you need to build automation that involves conditions, data transformation, and multiple branches, Make’s visual canvas is far superior to Zapier’s linear interface.
2. Apps & Integrations
Make connects to 2,000+ apps with pre-built modules:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Productivity | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Notion, Slack |
| Marketing | Mailchimp, HubSpot, ActiveCampaign, Kit, Beehiiv |
| CRM | Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho |
| E-commerce | Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce |
| File Storage | Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, OneDrive |
| Social Media | Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X |
| Payments | Stripe, PayPal, Square |
| Development | GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear |
| HTTP/API | Custom HTTP requests, Webhooks, JSON/XML tools |
3. Operations & Data Transfer
Make uses an operation-based pricing model. Each module execution in a scenario counts as 1 operation. A 10-step scenario running 100 times uses 1,000 operations.
| Feature | Free | Core | Pro | Teams |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operations/mo | 1,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000/user |
| Active scenarios | 2 | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Min. interval | 15 min | 1 min | 1 min | 1 min |
| Data transfer | 1 GB | 5 GB | 5 GB | 5 GB/user |
| Execution log | 24 hours | 3 days | 7 days (full text) | 7 days |
4. Maia AI (AI Scenario Builder)
Launched in 2025, Maia is Make’s AI-powered assistant that can:
- Describe your workflow in natural language and generate scenario suggestions
- Recommend modules based on your automation goal
- Help debug scenarios by analyzing execution errors
- Optimize existing workflows for efficiency
Maia is available on all Make plans and reduces the time to build complex scenarios significantly.
5. Webhooks & API
- Incoming webhooks – trigger scenarios from any app that supports webhooks
- Custom HTTP requests – interact with any REST API directly
- JSON/XML parsing – transform complex data formats
- Real-time triggers – instant scenario execution instead of polling
6. Data Transformation
Make includes powerful inline data transformation tools:
- Text functions – concatenate, split, replace, regex
- Math operations – arithmetic, rounding, math functions
- Date/time formatting – convert, parse, format dates
- Array/collection tools – map, filter, sort, slice
- JSON tools – parse, stringify, merge JSON objects
- Base64 encoding – encode/decode files and data
7. Scheduling & Real-time
| Execution Type | Free | Paid |
|---|---|---|
| Polling (scheduled) | Every 15 min | Every 1 min |
| Webhook (instant) | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time triggers | Limited | Full |
8. Error Handling
- Error rollback – revert partial scenario execution on failure
- Break/continue – decide whether to stop or skip on error
- Incomplete executions – see exactly where and why a scenario failed
- Alerting – receive notifications on scenario failures
9. Team Collaboration (Teams Plan)
- Shared scenario templates – build once, deploy across team
- Team roles – admin, designer, operator roles
- Scenario permissions – control who can edit, view, or run workflows
- Organization dashboard – overview of all team scenarios
Pricing Breakdown
| Plan | Monthly Price | Annual Price (per month) | Operations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 1,000/mo | Learning and testing |
| Core | $9/mo | ~$9/mo | 10,000/mo | Solopreneurs, freelancers |
| Pro | $16/mo | ~$16/mo | 10,000/mo | Growing businesses |
| Teams | $29/mo | ~$29/mo | 10,000/mo per user | Collaborating teams |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom | Custom | Large organizations |
Scalable operations: All paid plans allow you to scale operations to higher tiers (20k, 40k, 80k, 150k, 300k, 500k, 750k, 1M+ operations/month) with proportional pricing. You can adjust via a slider on Make’s pricing page.
Free Plan Highlights
- 1,000 operations per month
- 2 active scenarios
- 15-minute minimum scheduling interval
- 1 GB data transfer
- Access to 2,000+ apps
- 24-hour execution log retention
Core Plan Highlights ($9/mo)
- 10,000 operations per month (10x the free tier)
- Unlimited active scenarios
- 1-minute minimum scheduling interval
- Make API access
- Webhooks and HTTP modules
Pro Plan Highlights ($16/mo)
- 10,000 operations per month (scalable)
- Priority execution (faster during peak times)
- Full-text execution log search
- Custom variables and scenario inputs
- 2 user seats
- 7-day execution log retention
Teams Plan Highlights ($29/mo)
- 10,000 operations per month per user
- Team roles and permissions
- Shared scenario templates
- Priority execution
- Collaborative workspace
Make Free vs Core: Which Should You Pick?
The Free plan is a great way to explore the platform, but the 1,000 operations/month limit and 15-minute intervals make it unsuitable for production use. A single 10-step scenario running 10 times per day uses ~3,000 operations – exceeding the free limit. Core at $9/mo is the minimum viable plan for real business automation.
What Surprised Me
| # | Surprise | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Visual canvas is genuinely powerful | Routers, iterators, aggregators – Zapier can’t match this |
| 2 | 2,000+ app connectors | Covers nearly every major SaaS tool |
| 3 | Operations are more efficient than Zapier tasks | Make processes complex workflows with fewer operations |
| 4 | Maia AI scenario builder | Describe what you want, and AI suggests scenarios |
| 5 | Webhook and HTTP modules | Connect to any API, not just pre-built apps |
| 6 | Real-time triggers | Instant execution via webhooks instead of polling |
| 7 | Error handling is excellent | Rollback, break, continue, and detailed error logs |
| 8 | Data transformation tools | Inline functions for text, math, arrays, and JSON |
| 9 | Prague-based engineering | Strong European engineering team, bootstrapped success story |
Things I Didn’t Expect
| # | Surprise | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Learning curve is steep | More powerful than Zapier but harder to learn |
| 2 | Free plan is tight | 1,000 ops and 2 scenarios barely covers testing |
| 3 | No enterprise SSO on lower plans | Requires custom Enterprise plan |
| 4 | Operations add up fast | Each module step is 1 operation per execution |
| 5 | No native CRM or form builder | It’s pure automation, not a platform |
| 6 | Interface can feel overwhelming | So many options that new users get lost |
| 7 | Limited templates compared to Zapier | Community template library is smaller |
| 8 | Scaling operations costs add up | High-volume automation gets expensive |
Where Competitors Still Do Better
| # | Weakness | Who Does It Better |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ease of use for simple automations | Zapier (set up in minutes) |
| 2 | Template library size | Zapier (largest template ecosystem) |
| 3 | Enterprise SSO included | Workato, Boomi |
| 4 | Open-source flexibility | n8n (self-hosted, full control) |
| 5 | Pre-built automation packs | HubSpot Operations Hub |
| 6 | CRM-native automation | Salesforce Flow, HubSpot workflows |
| 7 | Simple “if this then that” for consumers | IFTTT |
| 8 | Native AI agent workflows | n8n (more flexible AI node support) |
Competitor Score Matrix
| Platform | Ease of Use | Visual Builder | App Connectors | Automation Depth | Value for Money | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Make | 3.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Zapier | 5/5 | 2.5/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| n8n | 3/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 5/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Workato | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| IFTTT | 5/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
Make vs Competitors
vs Zapier
| Aspect | Make | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0 (1k ops) | $0 (100 tasks/mo) |
| Free plan limit | 1,000 ops/mo | 100 tasks/mo |
| Visual builder | Canvas with routers & iterators | Linear step-by-step |
| Learning curve | Moderate | Low |
| App connectors | 2,000+ | 6,000+ |
| Operations/task pricing | ~$0.0009/op (Core) | ~$0.0029/task (Starter) |
| AI features | Maia AI builder | Zapier AI (Central) |
| Best for | Complex, branching workflows | Simple, quick automations |
Winner: Make for complex workflows and cost per operation. Zapier for simplicity and larger app ecosystem.
vs n8n
| Aspect | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Cloud (Make-managed) | Self-hosted or n8n Cloud |
| Pricing | $9-$29/mo | Free (self-hosted) or $20/mo (Cloud) |
| Visual builder | Excellent canvas | Good node-based editor |
| App connectors | 2,000+ pre-built | 400+ pre-built, community nodes |
| Open-source | No | Yes (Fair-code license) |
| Privacy | Data processed on Make servers | Full control on self-hosted |
| AI agents | Maia + MCP support | Stronger AI agent nodes |
| Best for | Plug-and-play, large app library | Privacy-conscious, custom workflows |
Winner: Make for ease of use and app variety. n8n for open-source flexibility and self-hosting.
vs Workato
| Aspect | Make | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $9/mo (Core) | ~$10,000/yr (Enterprise) |
| Target audience | SMB to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Visual builder | Excellent canvas | Good canvas |
| App connectors | 2,000+ | 1,200+ |
| Enterprise features | Limited (custom plan) | SSO, audit logs, governance |
| Best for | Small to mid-size businesses | Large enterprise integration needs |
Winner: Make for affordability and accessibility. Workato for enterprise compliance and governance.
vs IFTTT
| Aspect | Make | IFTTT |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0 (1k ops) | $0 (3 applets) |
| Complexity | High (professional) | Low (consumer) |
| App connectors | 2,000+ professional tools | 800+ consumer apps |
| Visual builder | Advanced canvas | Simple if/then |
| Best for | Business automation | Smart home / consumer use |
Winner: Make for professional automation. IFTTT for simple consumer and smart home integrations.
What Users Are Saying
Praise Points (from Reddit, G2, and TrustRadius reviews)
“I switched from Zapier to Make and my mind was blown. The router module alone lets me build workflows that would require 20+ separate Zaps in Zapier. My monthly costs dropped by 60%.”
“Make’s visual canvas is the closest thing to having a developer build custom integrations. I can see the entire data flow, debug visually, and fix issues without guessing.”
“Maia AI is surprisingly good. I typed ‘Send Slack notification when a new Stripe customer signs up’ and it built the entire scenario for me.”
Common Complaints
“The learning curve is real. I spent a weekend learning Make before I felt productive. Zapier I could figure out in 10 minutes.”
“Operations management is tricky. A 15-step scenario running hourly burns through operations faster than you realize. You have to constantly monitor your usage.”
“Self-hosting competitors like n8n give you more control. Make is cloud-only and you’re subject to their uptime and data processing policies.”
The Balanced View
Make’s strongest supporters are users who outgrew Zapier’s simplicity and needed real automation logic. Its critics are users who want a quick set-it-and-forget-it experience. For complex, production-grade automation, Make is the clear leader in no-code. For simple integrations, Zapier remains faster to set up.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Make really free?
Yes. The Free plan gives you 1,000 operations per month, 2 active scenarios, and access to all 2,000+ app connectors. It’s great for testing and learning, but 1,000 operations is tight for real business use.
What is Make’s difference from Zapier?
Make uses a visual canvas with routers, iterators, and aggregators for complex, branching workflows. Zapier uses a linear step-by-step interface. Make is more powerful for complex automation; Zapier is faster for simple workflows.
How much does Make cost after the free plan?
The Core plan is $9/mo (10,000 operations), Pro is $16/mo, and Teams is $29/mo per user. You can scale operations on any paid plan up to 1M+ operations per month.
What happened to Integromat?
Integromat rebranded to Make in February 2022. The platform, team, and functionality are the same – just with a new name, domain (make.com), and a redesigned visual builder. The transition was completed by the end of 2022.
Is Make owned by Celonis?
Yes. Make was acquired by Celonis in October 2020 for over $100 million. Celonis is a German process-mining company. Make operates as a business unit within Celonis, with its engineering team remaining in Prague.
How many operations do I need?
Each module execution in a scenario is 1 operation. A 10-step scenario running 100 times = 1,000 operations. Most small businesses start with 10,000-20,000 operations per month on the Core plan.
Does Make have AI features?
Yes. Make launched Maia in 2025, an AI scenario builder that can generate workflows from natural language descriptions. Make also supports MCP (Model Context Protocol) for AI agent integration.
Can Make work with custom APIs?
Yes. Make has HTTP modules that can make GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests to any REST API. You can also set up incoming webhooks to trigger scenarios from any webhook-supporting service.
Is Make good for teams?
Yes, the Teams plan ($29/mo per user) includes shared scenario templates, role-based permissions, and a collaborative workspace. Larger teams can contact Make for custom Enterprise plans.
What is the difference between operations and tasks?
Make uses “operations” for each module execution. Zapier uses “tasks” for completed automation runs. Both are similar concepts, but Make generally processes complex workflows more efficiently because operations count per module step rather than per complete run.
Final Verdict
Make is the best no-code automation platform for anyone who has outgrown simple if-this-then-that workflows. The visual canvas, routers, iterators, and data transformation tools give you near-developer-level power without writing code. The 2,000+ app connectors and affordable pricing make it an excellent value.
However, the learning curve is steeper than Zapier, the free plan is limited, and cloud-only hosting may not suit privacy-conscious organizations. For most SMBs, marketing teams, and operations professionals, Make is the automation platform to beat in 2026.
Rating: 4.5 / 5 Stars Award: Best Visual Automation Platform (2026)
Who should buy it:
- Operations teams tired of Zapier’s linear limitations
- Anyone building complex, branching automation workflows
- Small businesses wanting professional-grade automation
- Developers who want to offload simple integrations
Who should skip it:
- Non-technical users who want instant setup (use Zapier)
- Privacy-conscious teams needing self-hosting (use n8n)
- Enterprise teams needing SSO without custom pricing
- Users with simple, 2-step automations only
Disclosure: This review contains affiliate links. If you sign up through our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. All opinions are based on independent research and user feedback.